<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>What Is Funny? &#187; Madvertising</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.whatisfunny.net/category/madvertising/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.whatisfunny.net</link>
	<description>Funny stuff and other stuff too.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 19:37:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Ferris Bueller ad reminds everyone why advertising doesn&#8217;t really work</title>
		<link>http://www.whatisfunny.net/madvertising/ferris-bueller-ad-reminds-everyone-why-advertising-doesnt-really-work/</link>
		<comments>http://www.whatisfunny.net/madvertising/ferris-bueller-ad-reminds-everyone-why-advertising-doesnt-really-work/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 19:37:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Madvertising]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whatisfunny.net/?p=1605</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lots of talk about the Honda Ferris Bueller ad, in which Matthew Broderick reprises his role as Ferris to sell cars. The ad itself is fine. Some of it&#8217;s funny. Some of it is uninspired. Matthew Broderick definitely doesn&#8217;t seem to be having much fun throughout. It&#8217;s a little weird because the premise is he&#8217;s [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lots of talk about the <a href="http://automobiles.honda.com/leap-list/2012-cr-v-videos/?ef_id=LvJOdMAC7XcAAAwX:20120201130409:s">Honda Ferris Bueller ad</a>, in which Matthew Broderick reprises his role as Ferris to sell cars.</p>
<p>The ad itself is fine. Some of it&#8217;s funny. Some of it is uninspired. Matthew Broderick definitely doesn&#8217;t seem to be having much fun throughout. It&#8217;s a little weird because the premise is he&#8217;s playing hooky from coming into work. What work? Hasn&#8217;t he been playing hooky for like the last 10 years?</p>
<p>Also, this is one of those tricks you only get to play once, so it&#8217;s kind of a shame it had to be in a commerical for a rather boring car.</p>
<p>Speaking of which, in all the debate over whether this ad is <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/02/01/in_defense_of_ferris_bueller_car_salesman/">good</a> or a <a href="http://www.slate.com/blogs/browbeat/2012/01/30/ferris_bueller_ad_for_honda_disappoints.html">travesty</a>, what I don&#8217;t hear people talking about is the car. I have seen the spot several times and I still can&#8217;t remember the name of it. I think it&#8217;s like an SUV like thing? I don&#8217;t know. I don&#8217;t know any of its features or any of the things it does. Sometimes I think it was a Toyota until I remember Toyota only makes boring ads that sell cars.</p>
<p>But why worry about a little thing like working? If advertising were held to that standard, all of us who make a living at it would be taking many, many days off.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whatisfunny.net/madvertising/ferris-bueller-ad-reminds-everyone-why-advertising-doesnt-really-work/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>This week in TV Failure</title>
		<link>http://www.whatisfunny.net/madvertising/this-week-in-tv-failure/</link>
		<comments>http://www.whatisfunny.net/madvertising/this-week-in-tv-failure/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2011 17:06:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Low Art]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Madvertising]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whatisfunny.net/?p=1499</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That the &#8220;Glee Project,&#8221; a reality TV show built around the show Glee debuted to terrible numbers on Oxygen is not really surprising. Oxygen is a shitty network and about ten shows too late to the music competition genre. What is surprising, or maybe just amusing, is the reason experts are speculating the debut flopped. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That the<a href="http://thegleeproject.oxygen.com/?#fbid=-vp2XWW5nlG"> &#8220;Glee Project,&#8221;</a> a reality TV show built around the show Glee <a href="http://www.adweek.com/news/television/gasping-airtime-oxygen-chokes-glee-project-ratings-132534">debuted to terrible numbers</a> on Oxygen is not really surprising. Oxygen is a shitty network and about ten shows too late to the music competition genre.</p>
<p>What is surprising, or maybe just amusing, is the reason experts are speculating the debut flopped. Per Ad week:</p>
<blockquote><p>What’s curious about the poor turnout for <em>The Glee Project </em>is that the pilot generally garnered <a href="http://www.metacritic.com/tv/the-glee-project/season-1" target="_blank">positive reviews</a>, [...] some speculated the premiere flagged because it bowed opposite the deciding game of the NBA Finals</p></blockquote>
<p>Really? Are we too believe that viewers sat down and prepared to watch a show about high school kids singing cheesy renditions of popular music from the 1980s but then said, &#8220;nah, you know what, I&#8217;m just going to watch some basketball.&#8221;</p>
<p>Extra kudos to Adweek for the punny article title: &#8220;Gasping for Airtime: Oxygen Chokes on Glee.&#8221; Much better than my thought for a headline: &#8220;Wait&#8230;there&#8217;s an Oxygen Network?&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whatisfunny.net/madvertising/this-week-in-tv-failure/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Proof that advertising is about aspiration, not reality</title>
		<link>http://www.whatisfunny.net/madvertising/proof-that-advertising-is-about-aspiration-not-reality/</link>
		<comments>http://www.whatisfunny.net/madvertising/proof-that-advertising-is-about-aspiration-not-reality/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jun 2011 18:28:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Madvertising]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whatisfunny.net/?p=1495</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Macy&#8217;s ad in Miami provides the ultimate example of advertising as wish-fulfillment, following the Miami Heat&#8217;s finals loss last week.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: left;">Macy&#8217;s ad in Miami provides the ultimate example of advertising as wish-fulfillment, following the Miami Heat&#8217;s finals loss last week.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.whatisfunny.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/congratulations-miami-detail.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-1496" title="congratulations-miami-detail" src="http://www.whatisfunny.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/congratulations-miami-detail.jpg" alt="" width="484" height="272" /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whatisfunny.net/madvertising/proof-that-advertising-is-about-aspiration-not-reality/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Upfront Season</title>
		<link>http://www.whatisfunny.net/madvertising/upfront-season/</link>
		<comments>http://www.whatisfunny.net/madvertising/upfront-season/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 May 2011 23:32:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Low Art]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Madvertising]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whatisfunny.net/?p=1484</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s upfront season, where the TV Networks unveil the lineup of shows they will soon cancel. It&#8217;s a magical week really, in which poor TV executives are forced to stand in front of jaded media buyers, who want only to be plied with free cocktails and cool gift bags, and pretend like the new show [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s upfront season, where the TV Networks unveil the lineup of shows they will soon cancel. It&#8217;s a magical week really, in which poor TV executives are forced to stand in front of jaded media buyers, who want only to be plied with free cocktails and cool gift bags, and pretend like the new show about a group of guys carpooling to work isn&#8217;t totally and unquestionably doomed to failure.</p>
<p>That said, I always use this week as an opportunity to pitch, what I believe are sure-fire TV hits:</p>
<ul>
<li>Jurassic Park Park: The story of a group of people who work at a Jurassic Park theme park. It&#8217;s sort of like Friends, but with more dinosaurs. Also, at night the dinosaurs come to life and do mischief. Also, there is a group of rich high school students who gossip about things at the park and do drugs a lot.</li>
<li>Guess Whose Coming to Dinner?: A reality concept in which a regular family gets a surprise visit from a celebrity chef, who belittles how terrible their cooking is, before eventually teaching them a lesson about how important eating meals as a family is.</li>
<li>Community: This is an awesome show. They should make another one.</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whatisfunny.net/madvertising/upfront-season/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>If you need to cast an actor to star as the head of a major advertising angency, I have your man</title>
		<link>http://www.whatisfunny.net/madvertising/if-you-need-to-cast-an-actor-to-star-as-the-head-of-a-major-advertising-angency-i-have-your-man/</link>
		<comments>http://www.whatisfunny.net/madvertising/if-you-need-to-cast-an-actor-to-star-as-the-head-of-a-major-advertising-angency-i-have-your-man/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 May 2011 20:43:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Madvertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clark gregg]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whatisfunny.net/?p=1469</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What do the top 10 earners in the ad bizz have in common? They all look exactly like actor Clark Gregg. Check below and see if you can identify who heads up ad conglomerate IPG and who starred in The New Adventures of Old Christine. - - - - - - - - - - [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.adweek.com/news/advertising-branding/top-10-earners-advertising-131424">What do the top 10 earners in the ad bizz</a> have in common? They all look exactly like actor <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0163988/">Clark Gregg</a>. Check below and see if you can identify who heads up ad conglomerate IPG and who starred in <em>The New Adventures of Old Christine</em>.</p>
<p>-</p>
<p><a href="http://www.whatisfunny.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/FrankMergenthaler.jpg"><img class="size-thumbnail wp-image-1470 alignleft" title="FrankMergenthaler" src="http://www.whatisfunny.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/FrankMergenthaler-150x150.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="150" /></a></p>
<p>-</p>
<p>-</p>
<p>-</p>
<p>-</p>
<p>-</p>
<p>-</p>
<p>-</p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><a href="http://www.whatisfunny.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/clark-gregg.jpg"><img class="size-thumbnail wp-image-1471" title="clark gregg" src="http://www.whatisfunny.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/clark-gregg-150x150.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="150" /></a>-</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">-</p>
<p><a href="http://www.whatisfunny.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/Randy_Weisenburger1.jpg"><img class="size-thumbnail wp-image-1472 alignleft" title="Randy_Weisenburger(1)" src="http://www.whatisfunny.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/Randy_Weisenburger1-150x150.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="150" /></a></p>
<p style="text-align: left;">&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whatisfunny.net/madvertising/if-you-need-to-cast-an-actor-to-star-as-the-head-of-a-major-advertising-angency-i-have-your-man/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ad campaign finally brave enough to tell women their armpits are ugly</title>
		<link>http://www.whatisfunny.net/madvertising/ad-campaign-finally-brave-enough-to-tell-women-their-armpits-are-ugly/</link>
		<comments>http://www.whatisfunny.net/madvertising/ad-campaign-finally-brave-enough-to-tell-women-their-armpits-are-ugly/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2011 17:11:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Madvertising]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whatisfunny.net/?p=1442</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For years, PC ads have been coddling women, only telling them they are fat and pimply and have yellow teeth, but never, ever acknowledging the real problem&#8211;their armpits are ugly. Now, Dove has fixed that by reminding women how awful and terrible their armpits really are. Thankfully, Dove also has a cure for this. What [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For years, PC ads have been coddling women, only telling them they are fat and pimply and have yellow teeth, but never, ever acknowledging the real problem&#8211;their armpits are ugly.</p>
<p>Now, <a href="http://www.slate.com/id/2291205/" target="_blank">Dove has fixed that by reminding women how awful and terrible their armpits really are</a>. Thankfully, Dove also has a cure for this. What a lucky break. That&#8217;s like two mitzvahs in one ad!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whatisfunny.net/madvertising/ad-campaign-finally-brave-enough-to-tell-women-their-armpits-are-ugly/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Annoying new marketing buzz word</title>
		<link>http://www.whatisfunny.net/madvertising/annoying-new-marketing-buzz-word/</link>
		<comments>http://www.whatisfunny.net/madvertising/annoying-new-marketing-buzz-word/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Apr 2011 18:49:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Madvertising]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whatisfunny.net/?p=1437</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you are a viewer of the Style Network, you could be a Shoptimist, the clever marketing term being used by the network to describe their unique viewers, evoking: a certain kind of woman between the age of 18 and 49 who is not only a confirmed shopping enthusiast but a trusted brand evangelist. A [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you are a viewer of the Style Network, you could be a <a href="http://www.adweek.com/aw/content_display/news/media/e3i957b94cbebb211d46f17f4c15614f952">Shoptimist</a>, the clever marketing term being used by the network to describe their unique viewers, evoking:</p>
<blockquote><p>a certain kind of woman between the age of 18 and 49 who is not only a confirmed shopping enthusiast but a trusted brand evangelist.</p></blockquote>
<p>A shopping enthusiast and a brand evangelist? Why do we need a new term to describe these people when the old one worked so well? You know, <em>suckers</em>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whatisfunny.net/madvertising/annoying-new-marketing-buzz-word/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>When sexism just isn&#8217;t enough</title>
		<link>http://www.whatisfunny.net/madvertising/when-sexism-just-isnt-enough/</link>
		<comments>http://www.whatisfunny.net/madvertising/when-sexism-just-isnt-enough/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Apr 2011 17:40:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Madvertising]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whatisfunny.net/?p=1427</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Godaddy.com is well known for their super bowl ads, in which scantly clad women dance around, reminding us that, on some level, website domain registration is ultimately about repressed sexuality. And sure, Godaddy has been criticized plenty for the alleged &#8220;sexism&#8221; of these ads.  But getting picked at by a few feminists for being sexist [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Godaddy.com is well known for their<a href="http://abcnews.go.com/Business/daddy-hopes-super-bowl-ads-push-boundaries/story?id=12832623" target="_blank"> super bowl ads</a>, in which scantly clad women dance around, reminding us that, on some level, website domain registration is ultimately about repressed sexuality.</p>
<p>And sure, Godaddy has been criticized plenty for the alleged &#8220;sexism&#8221; of these ads.  But getting picked at by a few feminists for being sexist is small potatoes, so CEO Bob Parson did what any responsible corporate leader concerned about his company&#8217;s image would do:  He went out and<a href="http://www.cnn.com/2011/BUSINESS/04/01/godaddy.peta.protest/index.html?hpt=T2" target="_blank"> killed an elephant</a>, than posted pictures of it on the internet. Well done.</p>
<p>This makes rival controversy-seeking Virgin CEO Richard Branson&#8217;s plan to post videos of himself ordering swordfish on Youtube seem quite lame indeed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whatisfunny.net/madvertising/when-sexism-just-isnt-enough/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>People don&#8217;t watch the Super Bowl for the ads</title>
		<link>http://www.whatisfunny.net/madvertising/people-dont-watch-the-super-bowl-for-the-ads/</link>
		<comments>http://www.whatisfunny.net/madvertising/people-dont-watch-the-super-bowl-for-the-ads/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Feb 2011 18:48:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Madvertising]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whatisfunny.net/?p=1324</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If there&#8217;s one madvertising myth I&#8217;d love to pop it&#8217;s this: people watch the super bowl for the ads. Actually, people (including, or maybe especially advertising people) hate the ads in the super bowl, a fact they forget every year and thus we get lots and lots of post super bowl chatter every year about [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If there&#8217;s one madvertising myth I&#8217;d love to pop it&#8217;s this: people watch the super bowl for the ads.</p>
<p>Actually, people (including, or maybe especially advertising people) hate the ads in the super bowl, a fact they forget every year and thus we get lots and lots of post super bowl chatter <em>every year</em> about how<a href="http://adage.com/superbowl/article?article_id=148720"> disappointing the super bowl ads were</a> this year.</p>
<p>So people, please bookmark this page and so next year when you are at your super bowl watch party and you watch those first few ads with eager anticipation and then feel a tingling feeling that is eerily like utter disappointment setting in after each ad fails to elevate above being mildly interesting and remind yourself of this: the only difference between the super bowl ads you watch and the ads every other day of the year you (try to) avoid is that super bowl ads are really, really expensive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whatisfunny.net/madvertising/people-dont-watch-the-super-bowl-for-the-ads/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Controversial MTV show Exposes Terrible Media Plan</title>
		<link>http://www.whatisfunny.net/madvertising/controversial-mtv-show-exposes-terrible-media-plan/</link>
		<comments>http://www.whatisfunny.net/madvertising/controversial-mtv-show-exposes-terrible-media-plan/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Jan 2011 20:46:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Madvertising]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whatisfunny.net/?p=1309</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As advertisers flee from the super-controversial MTV show Skins, which is the first ever TV show to depict sexual situations on TV with young people, one brand stands out from the rest. H&#38;R Block, who is pulling its ads after the shows too-hot-for-tax-advice debut. This of course raises troubling questions such as, why the hell [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As advertisers flee from the <a href="http://www.thedailybeast.com/cheat-sheet/item/mtvs-skins-loses-more-advertisers/too-hot/" target="_blank">super-controversial MTV show Skins</a>, which is the first ever TV show to depict sexual situations on TV with young people, one brand stands out from the rest. H&amp;R Block, who <a href="http://www.tmz.com/2011/01/22/h-and-r-block-skins-mtv-advertisment-show-commercial-pulled/" target="_self">is pulling its ads</a> after the shows too-hot-for-tax-advice debut.</p>
<p>This of course raises troubling questions such as, why the hell is H&amp;R Block running ads on MTV? Note to H&amp;R Block media planners: if you see your ad next to pimple cream, you are in the wrong place.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whatisfunny.net/madvertising/controversial-mtv-show-exposes-terrible-media-plan/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

